Neural Models
The VALAWAI project draws inspiration from the Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW) and Reflective Global Neuronal Workspace (RGNW) models. This section introduces these models to provide context for the principles guiding the development of the VALAWAI architecture.
The Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW)
The Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW) model, originally proposed by Stanislas Dehaene and Jean-Pierre Changeux [Dehaene et al., 2011], builds upon the earlier Global Workspace model (GW) of Baars [Baars, 1997], which itself was inspired by Blackboard Systems developed in AI in the late 1960s [Engelmore and Morgan, 1988]. The term "Neuronal" signifies that the GNW incorporates testable hypotheses about the neurophysiological implementation of a Global Workspace. Dehaene, Changeux, et al. [Dehaene et al., 2011] suggest the existence of a network of widely distributed excitatory neurons in the human brain (GNW neurons) with long-range axons. These axons can receive bottom-up information from and transmit top-down information to lower-level modules, enabling information selection and broadcasting. The GNW theory also proposes the concept of "ignition," defined as a sudden, coherent, and exclusive activation of a subset of workspace neurons coding for the current conscious content, while the remaining workspace neurons are inhibited.
For the development of a computational cognitive architecture for modeling value awareness in AI, VALAWAI operationalizes the GNW by assuming a distributed bottom layer (corresponding to layer C0 in [Dehaene et al., 2011]) of modules (agents in multi-agent systems, MAS). Each module performs a specific function, such as face recognition, sentiment analysis, topic modeling, emotion detection, semantic frame extraction, or value judgment. These modules operate autonomously, using and producing information encapsulated within the module (hidden from other modules), and they operate in parallel. Their bottom-up function is triggered by environmental or internal input, and they are potentially influenced by top-down contextual expectations and an attention system that focuses mental activity.
This bottom layer is augmented by a second layer, the global workspace (corresponding to layer C1 in [Dehaene et al., 2011]). The global workspace facilitates information flow between modules and is governed by top-down and bottom-up loops. Similar to the original Global Workspace model, VALAWAI assumes a winner-takes-all dynamic in which the outputs of different modules compete and are selected to reach a globally coherent hypothesis about the state of the world and necessary actions.
The global workspace can be operationalized as a data structure where low-level modules write and read information, along with a central supervisor that manages contradictory information flow and selects which hypotheses receive more attention. This centralized approach echoes the Blackboard architectures in AI, named after the metaphor of writing on a blackboard (the central data structure). Alternatively, a self-organizing dynamical systems approach to information integration could be used, as proposed in the Dynamic Core hypothesis and Neuronal Group Selection theory of [Tononi and Edelman, 1998].
The Reflective Global Neuronal Workspace (RGNW)
To incorporate value awareness into the GNW model, VALAWAI introduces a reflective layer. The original GNW model addresses how the distributed cognitive processing in the workspace converges on a unified situation description and how decisions are subsequently made. However, consciousness also involves reflection and meta-level reasoning. This dual processing nature is evident in moral judgment, which involves both direct intuitive judgment and rational symbolic decision-making [Haidt, 2013]. Neuro-imaging studies have also confirmed this dual processing [Greene et al., 2001].
Processing at layers C0 (information extraction) and C1 (information integration) is often
termed primary consciousness and relates to Kahneman's "fast intuitive decision-making" (System 1).
Processing at layer C2 is often referred to as higher-order consciousness and relates to
Kahneman's "slow decision-making" (System 2). VALAWAI addresses the reflective aspect of
consciousness by including a meta-layer (corresponding to layer C2), which monitors activity
at C1 and engages in deliberation. The outcome of this deliberation can then be injected back
into C1 through re-entrant processing. This approach is similar to the cognitive architecture
for robot consciousness proposed by [Chella et al., 2008].
VALAWAI's focus is on C2 components that reflect specifically on values. The technical capabilities
described earlier will form the capabilities of these C2 components, and the achievements of
value-awareness will manifest through C2's interaction with C1 and C0.